But Paidion effective refutes your claim about the meaning of “Word of God” in 19:13 by demonstrating that Jesus is distinguished from “the Word of God” in 1:2 and 20:4. Despite the blood allusion, “Word of God” likely has its normal meaning of message from God. Logos is not used alone in Revelation as it is in John.
You have absolutely NO idea… 
Did it never occur to you that whoever the writer of Revelation was they could walk and chew gum at the same time? What Paidion raised in no way refutes what Steve mentioned relative to Jn 1:1, 14 and what Rev 19:13 plainly SAYS. John can refer to differing aspects WITHOUT refuting or contradicting HIMSELF… what Paidion raised is a comparative difference relative to its context, i.e., the witness of Jesus WITHIN the broader word of God.