I understand. Good luck and my prayers are with you.
But Chad - does this mean it’s OVER between us?? Is this it, the final straw? End of the line? A bridge too far? The nuclear option??
No sir, if I can be blunt, I don’t care what you believe. You are who you are and I am what I am. I still love you and hope to meet you some day. Anyone who builds guitars is okay in my book!
Good. It was exhausting trying to think of more silly metaphors for ‘breaking up’.
I actually DO care what you believe, and not just you but others here as well. I find it stimulating/exhilarating/exhausting/irritating/nourishing/- did I already say irritating?
Peace, and guitars.
That makes me think of a great acoustic song about that subject…
Have fun …
Good song/performance. That guy might have a future…
Chad - PM sent
If I remember correctly, Luther called the book of James “an epistle of straw.”
Luther appears to me to be wrong. At least, I have found James to be a breath of fresh, no-nonsense air.
Sorry to go off topic but Dave you make custom guitars?
I think you are right. I think he was the first to translate the Bible into German. So you gotta wonder how much of his slant was put into his translation just as all translations.
The Greek word translated as “faith” in Romans 3:28 and in many other places in the Bible is pistis. One of the two main definitions of pistis is indeed “faithfulness.” And that definition helps remove the apparent if not real contradiction in the sheep and goats parable given by Jesus. In that parable, Jesus does not say a word about faith as saving the sheep. Instead he emphasizes that the sheep did good things for others in need. These things are precisely the sorts of things that Jesus himself did or would do. Having faithfulness in Jesus or being faithful to Jesus likely entails following his example or following his admonitions, e.g., loving others. Thus, the “faithfulness” definition of pistis makes the parable more compatible with the rest of scripture that emphasizes pistis. It’s less compatible if “faith” were intended as the definition, for as you said, why would faith in Jesus necessarily lead to such admirable behavior?
Yes, I agree. Regarding pistis as ‘faithfulness’ also sheds light on Paul’s saying ‘from pistis to pistis’ - translating as ‘faith’ is difficult; but by using ‘faithfulness’ in each position gives us what probably is Paul’s real meaning - that he, Paul, is laying out the utter faithfulness of God to the Abrahamic covenant even in the light of Jewish and gentile faithlessness, and that understanding of God’s faithfulness leads us to faithfulness.
From faithfulness TO faithfulness.
Luther’s translation into German may be superior to most or at least many translations. Several times when I have pointed out specific passages in which the Greek text differs a lot from the King James translation, Mennonites who were present and who regularly use Luther’s translation, have told me that the meaning in Greek that I pointed out, was the same as the meaning that comes out in Luther’s translation. I can’t vouch for the accuracy of that statement since I am not familiar with the German language.
My reading of what Luther was like is that he was a very um, Very stoic, and he had very strong individualistic views. Maybe you have read differently
Oh, I wasn’t commenting on his character. He hated Jews and had Anabaptists put to death. Notwithstanding, he was an excellent Greek scholar.
I think all men are saved, in terms of justification, from eternity but only realize this salvation upon faith.
Saved from what?
Saved from any sort of retributive or penal wrath on the part of God because they are all seen as righteous, from eternity. Furthermore, when they believe they are saved from the apprehension of wrath in their consciences.