Hi there. Theres no dilemma for me either. The dilemma belongs to those who’s rules of salvation leave them with Hitlers victims suffering eternal judgement alongside their murderer. The entire essay is meant to present to them a strong case that their theology is broken.
And a fine article it is too. Really well written and makes the points very elequently.I remember listening to a Martin Zender show where he made that same point, that according to traditional Christian doctrine the victims of Hitler went straight from the gas chambers to an eternity of torture. And they call that good news. Good to be amongst fellow believers. Just joined.
I believe the terrestrial realm was created purely for redemptive purposes. So that would make the material realm the place where judgement is meted out. Jesus said those who do not believe are “condemned already.” [John 3:18]
I think we can all agree that there is plenty of “weeping and gnashing of teeth” right here on this sin cursed earth. When we ascend to receive our celestial bodies [1 cor 15] this will all seem like a terrible nightmare and there will be no more tears.
Well that is terribly bleak. But if as some believe, the after life is a projection of ones own expectations, then you might want to work on that hopefulness.
I think we all have a tendency to think in terms of this terrestrial realm of time and space as thought that’s all there is or as though heaven is like the earth. Paul said "But as it is written, “Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.” (1 Cor 2:9). So we should lift our eyes to the heavens and realize that there is a reality far more glorious and amazing than this material world. The laws of nature only apply to the nature they were written for. This lower realm. Who can say what awaits us? Its so exciting!
wmb, you have to go back in time to understand why I and others here don’t believe anyone today is condemned. The context is the real issue. Jesus was indeed talking to the first century Christians… Good luck.
When Jesus announced in Matthew 24:34 that "this generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled,” he was prophetically addressing that yet future generation, those who will be alive when the events are finally being completely fulfilled.
Why didn’t Jesus say “that generation” instead of “this generation?”
Because up to 25.35 Jesus was talking about the destruction of Jerusalem so he did mean “this generation” at that time but at 25.35 or 36 he was talking about the second coming far in the future, not 70AD. IMO Mathew put together different discourses.
With prêterism you have… biblically historic prophetic pronouncement followed by biblically historic prophetic fulfilment — as then witnessed in biblical history.
With futurism you have… biblically historic prophetic pronouncement followed by unbiblical hysteric prediction — beyond the biblical story and endlessly so.
And yet none of the Church Fathers realised that the parousia had already taken place. How confused everybody was until centuries later when preterism reared it’s head.
How about the likes of Eusebius Pamphili of Caesarea (AD. 264-339) — he didn’t just collate his views in a vacuum — seems he was less confused than you are willing to credit on these things John…
Yes.
I’m still waiting for any evidence that the Church Fathers acknowledged that the parousia had taken place. I have already given you plenty of evidence that they still awaited the parousia (but you totally ignored that last week).
Thanks for confirming my point.
Oh, and BTW
You can choose not to believe the obvious, but the fallout is catastrophic, most of the gospel is filled with 'soon will happen vocabulary ’ and unfortunately the soon to happen has never happened from the evangelical view point. The idea that the parosia has not happened from the evangelical perspective is both sad and unfortunate, for most of Christianity today could be living in a mindset that God has indeed done what he both said he would do and and has accomplished through His son Christ. There is a unfortunate schism between evangelicals looking forward to a coming and the actual gospel text.
No, it is true. your view is simply a view. You continue to contend that the evangelical mindset of a yet coming Christ is totally true, when much factual evidence has been given that the parousia has indeed taken place. Yes you have numbers on your side but it is in forums like this that truth starts to be put forth.