Caroleem, you should also skip right to the end of MacDonald’s (2006) The evangelical universalist as he has a brief but worthwhile appendix (3, p.192-194) on this.
I’ve been greatly interested in this topic myself and think it’s an area of UR/eschatology ripe for further thought. Unfortunately my inquiry has yielded very little presently. If anyone else knows of any papers that may help, please suggest them. But I think I might be able to offer a few scattered thoughts on the subject, most of which Parry has already said.
It helps to remember that for the Hebrews (and if we adopt the testimony of the early church, John was a Hebrew), names were not just for identification as they generally are today. A name for the Hebrews indicated one’s very character, one’s very essence. This maybe why the Scriptures feature name changes so often, they indicate a new essence, or perhaps, a new relationship (often this name change was done by YHWH, but it was also done by the individual themselves, by other Hebrews, and even by enemies). So it’s not unreasonable to imagine that all of the names in the Book of Life, are those that reflect those with an inner life, the newly restored man (2 Corinthians 5:17), as a vessel of honour that in the Lake of Fire, God has finished crafting (presuming that the Lake of Fire is indeed the all-consuming presence of God; this is to be everyone eventually, according to Universalists); and those whose names that are not present, are the old men, those vessels of dishonour God has endured to be finally destroyed in the Lake of Fire. Interestingly, in the Hebrew, the word commonly used for ‘destruction’ (הרס) may also mean ‘deliverance’.
Whether this applies to all men or not, I like to think that one day God will destroy Andrew in the Lake of Fire (His presence), having preserved, perfected and delivered the new creation (whose name, as yet, is unknown to me).
Andrew