Maybe you hear crickets because you refuse to read what has already been written by someone on the topic? The way you chose to skip over my extensive comments on the sin against the Holy Spirit, so you could focus on a couple of places out of context and declare I was just inserting things.
Similarly, other people here will more likely recall that I have already written extensively on what the Epistle to the Hebrews has to say about condemnation; and that I am in the habit of referring to Heb 10 with some regularity along with its quote from Deut 32. I seem to recall writing extensively on 2 Peter 2:20-22 already, too (though not as lengthily as with EpistHeb, since naturally there’s a ton more material there to discuss.)
As to Rev 16, at the time you brought that up you had previously flamed out of the forum in a huff declaring that it was a sin against God for believers to debate or even discuss doctrinal differences, handing us over to Satan as condemned sinning heretics while you were at it. Nine days later you showed back up again and, up until recently, outright refused to acknowledge that one way or another you must have made at least one serious error in your departing manifesto. I said in your thread on Rev 16 that there was less than no point trying to have even a discussion with you on that, unless and until you recanted at least part of your huff. Since you (somewhat vaguely) did so eventually, I have now addressed Rev 16 in that thread–pointing out along the way that, ironically, I already addressed much of the key material in my extensive scriptural commentary on the final chapters of RevJohn (not restricted to those final chapters)–which, again, you have just disregarded to the point of pretty consistently pretending afterward that I had not even tried to answer from the scriptures at all (despite the FEW HUNDRED VERSE REFERENCES mentioned in my commentary.)
Beyond which, you insistently keep taking what I said about the lake of fire out of context, and parading it around out of context, as though anyone should be impressed by that.
So, seeing as the crickets you hear are only in your imagination, why exactly should anyone (whether myself or one of the professional authors–one of whom is dealing with a terminally ill wife) bother to do anything at all in this thread? You can complain about me writing “books” of material on it, or complain about me writing nothing on it, but you cannot do both without contradicting your own complaints.
When you want to take account of everything I’ve written on these topics already, I’ll be around. Until then, you can go impress the crickets you hear inside your head.
). The prophecies clearly state that all will be reconciled to God in Christ. This is His purpose of the ages which he created in Christ and for Him. Your ignorance of the details of the plan is not sufficient reason to declare God’s promises null and void.
