Which, according to continued traditional theology; Jesus was supposed to have thoroughly paid for, and suffered said infinite punishment for all of mankind. Grace is stronger than Sin, the Bible is clear on that - where sin abounds grace abounds more.
God elects people to believe, and by neglecting to elect all - elects many to disbelieve; and thereby elects many to eternal pain, punishing them with infinite punishment against them when he elected them to sin infinitely against him to begin with. He elects people to sin against him so he might punish them infinitely? Is it to prove to himself, and the elect, just how infinite he is?
That sounds an awful lot like a divine case of “entrapment”.
This is not the way God works. He is not a monster, any sane child can see how unfair it is, and rightly will say such a thing is not true of God.
A debt God thrust upon them without their permission or say-so, or choice in the matter; according to Calvinism especially.
The very idea of it makes God sound like a feudal lord, who captures land and forces the people to work as serfs, he elects a few to be vassals and knights, but the rest are left (and thereby elected) to be toilers in the field, owing a debt to their master, which if the master had not made them serfs to begin with they would not owe.
It also makes him sound like a cheater, a wicked loan shark, because his Son apparently paid all the debt of the serfs, but the feudal lord refuses to acknowledge the debt is paid, except for those few elect who were already his vassals and knights…when the dept (though including vassals and knights) was most specifically meant to pay the slave-debt of the serfs.
God is no feudal lord, but a fair king.
Also; Jesus paid everyone’s debt, the whole world. Not just a select few vassals or favourites. Calvinism grossly errs at this point especially.
