This is actually 2 pages of notes (of 8 total) for a class I’m to teach this Sabbath. (I worship with my church on Saturday)
Topic is “Creation and the Gospel”
My intent is to present a bunch of our favorite UR texts, but present them as “GOOD NEWS”…
That’s pretty easy.
I do not intend to use the word “Universalism” at all.
I’m leading up to asking (how this will develop is uncertain; it can happen is several different ways…) how we reconcile all this positive good news with common Christians views of hell/annihilation. And I am certain that the topic of “free will” shall be raised.
Thus I title this section:
Building towards a doctrine of Free Will…
Prevailing explanations for why there is a “BARRIER” between us and the GOOD NEWS is the notion of “FREE WILL”.
This theory holds that ===>
A) In order for love to be “genuine,” it must be “freely” given…
B) In order for love to be freely given, there must be a valid/live option not to love…
C) God has obligated Himself to “respect” this “freedom” to refuse His love…
D) Thus, one can/must “choose” to be saved; must have the will and desire to be saved…
…and so on…
However, does scripture actually teach this??? ===> Well…
Romans 9:14 What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! 15 For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” 16 It does NOT, therefore, depend on human desire or effort, but on God’s mercy. 17 For Scripture says to Pharaoh: “I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.” 18 Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden. 19 One of you will say to me: “Then why does God still blame us? For who is able to resist his will?” 20 But who are you, a human being, to talk back to God? “Shall what is formed say to the one who formed it, ‘Why did you make me like this?’” 21 Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use? 22 What if God, although choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath—prepared for destruction? 23 What if he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory— 24 even us, whom he also called, not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles? 25 As he says in Hosea: “I will call them ‘my people’ who are not my people; and I will call her ‘my loved one’ who is not my loved one,”
(Echoes of Ephesians 2: 8-9 ??? ===> 8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9 not by works, so that no one can boast.)
So ===> What does it mean to have “free will”??
At least 3 conditions are necessary:
A) one must be informed (ie know/understand the options AND their validity; know/understand the results of his choices; grasp cause/effect relationships etc.)
B) one must be undetermined, unforced, uncoerced etc. ie not acting under duress (ie compulsion under threat)
C) one must have at least a minimal degree of rationality
or, stated a bit differently:
Three great aspects of freedom are:
– A) the ability to perceive correctly and
– B) the power to act upon those correct perceptions and
– C) enough rationality to make coherent choices
Let us imagine a person who does something with NO motive for doing it AND with a very strong motive for NOT doing it; he displays the kind of irrationality that is itself incompatible with free choice. (paraphrase Talbott)
“If I am ignorant of, or deceived about, the true consequences of my choices, then I am in no position to embrace those consequences freely; and similarly, if I suffer from an illusion that conceals from me the true nature of God, or the true import of union with God, then I am again in no position to reject God freely.
Accordingly, the very conditions that render a less than fully informed decision to reject God intelligible also render it less than fully free; hence, God should be able to remove these conditions- the ignorance, the illusions, the bondage to unhealthy desires- without in any way interfering with human freedom.” (Talbott; p 185)
Jesus promised ====> “you WILL know the truth & the truth WILL set you free.” (John 8:32)
A “free” person does not choose separation from God; the very cause and source of his life… To do so demonstrates not freedom, but bondage! Bondage to illusions; to false perceptions; to “the lie.” (The lie that life is possible apart from God; the lie that God does not love us and desire our best; the lie that only (a) death will “satisfy” God for sin; the lie of our false identity…)
Instead of seeing self-destructive choices as being the decisions of a free mind then, it seems more appropriate to recognise this as evidence of a mind imprisoned by illusion, false perception, and irrationality.
God’s unilateral act of releasing us --setting us free!-- from bondage through Christ’s work of mediation (life/death/resurrection), does not, as some insist, violate our freedom. Instead it does the exact opposite; it establishes our freedom! And when truly free (ie informed, undetermined, and rational) we WILL respond to God!
How ironic that God, by insisting on our freedom – intervening (through Christ) in our history to make certain we ARE free! – is accused of violating our freedom!
8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8<>8
If you’ve any comments, suggestions, or spirit driven wisdom, I’d like to hear it!!
Thanks,
Bobx3