The Evangelical Universalist Forum

Can we love yet dislike?

While we wait for dear Pilgrim’s return from Spain to answer your kind post, Johnny, thank you Stuart for your reference to the Reformed version. After some random googling last night I get the gist of what must have prompted your remark supported by Johnny . This was my first introduction to the likes of mega Churches and people such as Rick Warren and John Piper. So even at this quick glance I add my voice to yours Johnny HERE HERE HERE to you Stuart!

Enjoy the summer - here it is ferociously hot!

Michael in Barcelona

I am still interested in rational (and spiritual) discussion on the two perspectives on ‘ayape’ love:

“Is it possible, in all Godliness, for us to Love a person as we ought whilst at the same time harbouring nothing but feelings of dislike towards that person?”

I contend that it is not possible, that one component of ‘agape’ is positive affection towards.
But, for those who believe that it IS possible, I see three scenarios:

a) The most horrrifying concept
I will do good to the person I harbour feelings of dislike towards in the hope that, in time or eternity, that person will change and become a person who is likeable to me.

b) The ‘salvation by works’ concept
I will do good to the person I harbour feelings of dislike towards in the hope that by doing so, in time or eternity, I will change into a person who is capable of liking him/her.

c) The eternal Limbo concept
I will do good to the person I harbour feelings of dislike towards with no reason to expect that situation to change either in time or eternity.

Footnote:
Now I am not suggesting that these three are mutually exclusive but that does not solve what I see to be a real problem. If the reality is 1/3 a) 2/3rds b) -same problems.
However, I AM at the moment considering these three to be exhaustive. Hence the problem.

Johnny, I welcome your input. I also thoroughly agree with your assessment that it is extremely difficult to communicate properly on these issues by internet posting.
How I wish we could meet face to face.
On that last statement (and I may be speaking prematurely) I hope by God’s grace (within two weeks DV) to take possession of an 11 bedroom property overlooking both the North and South bays at Scarborough. The property is derelict at the moment and in no condition to take guests but I can see the day when I would invite all those within reasonable distance to come and stay for a weekend (or more).
It is at the top where the land narrows:
mick-armitage.staff.shef.ac. … dland.html
Perhaps it could become a Universalist’s retreat!
As for the more immediate circumstance, I am about to spend 7 days at our studio on the sunny costa-del-sol without internet connection so if I do not reply for a while, that will almost certainly be the reason.
God bless.

Dear Pilgrim,

Without wishing to repeat myself for the moment (it’s just after 3 a.m.awakened by a sore back!), i would however answer your question in the affirmative with the support of two lives, those of Bonhoeffer and of Mandela.

Hope you will have enjoyed sunny Spain by the time you read this!

Blessings

Michael in Spain

Dear John,

I have been rereading this thread since your post on 28th October and have come across this post of yours earlier in the year. There is one thing that puzzles me which I think you need to clarify, and i refer to the last paragraphs.

In your last paragraph it seems to me that you are being very loving in your experience with someone for whom you have a natural aversion to (dislike). Getting to know them more and more, seeing them in more depth, developing an understanding, is that not the love of God shining through you towards those that you dislike.? And leading to an affection for them as they are

Blessings

Michael in Barcelona

Hi John

So that we can get what has been a very interesting discussion going again, please can you clarify something for me. You say:

I don’t quite get where you’re coming from here. Maybe it’s down to our differing definitions of ‘loving’ and ‘liking’, but I confess I don’t see why you find this concept horrifying. To use my earlier, extreme, example, I do not - or did not - ‘like’ Myra Hindley, given the terrible crimes she committed. As long as she persists, in this world or the next, in the behaviour that renders her unlikeable to me, I will continue to dislike her. But it is my Christian duty to do my best to love her all the same. With God’s grace one hopes that she will - or indeed already has - truly repent of her terrible crimes, and hence become a person who I can genuinely like.

Is this really such a terrible - horrifying - thing?

All the best

Johnny

Hi Michael
Thank you for your contribution but I do not understand the point you are making. Are you suggesting that Bonhoeffer and Mandela both loved whilst disliking and therefore it must be OK?
If that is your point then: 1) what evidence have you to support the assumption that they loved whilst disliking? 2) If they did, then how does that lead you to believe that that is what God wanted them to do (or us)?

God bless

Not at all. I would say that I am not able to be genuine with any ‘agape’ love until I have learned to like them. Only after this breakthrough am I able to embrace ‘ayape’ love.

I would say that it is rather, God’s love working on ME (not through me onto them) until I have learned to see the image of God in them and hence feel a genuine affection for them. Only then can I be free of any hypocrisy in loving them.

Blessings to you too my dear brother in Christ

Hi Johnny - it’s good to hear from you and I am praying that God will bless you and yours.
I find the concept horrifying from a Christian perspective because it judges the other person to be more in need of change than myself. The NT tells us that God Loved us WHILST we were in our sins and as you know, it is my understanding that His Love must also include the component of a positive affection towards. I know that I am in a minority with this view but it is genuinely held as I am sure yours is. If I feel dislike of someone, I believe that it is because I have failed to see the image of God in that human being. I believe that it is extremely unchristian for me to think that the other person is worse than myself and I also think it against our Father’s wishes for us to dislike ourselves because we too are a creation of the Master, however marred. So how can I feel it right to dislike someone and yet not dislike myself even more?

Let me consider the worst possible position - ie that of getting to know Myra Hindley before she had repented. (I don’t think I can comment based solely on reading newspaper reports and not actually knowing the person herself, so I must take a flight of fancy and imagine that I have spent time relating to the real Hindley before she had any remorse for her actions).
The first thing I must say is that I find it unchristian for me to assume that I am a better person than she. I have no idea what drove her to do such awful crimes and I have no idea that if I was born in her place I might not have committed the same sick crimes. I thank God that my life took a different course but I do not know if I have damaged any children through careless misplaced words. I believe that Christ would feel compassion for her and that is a positive emotion which requires an affection for the REAL human within the messed-up Myra. Likewise, I believe that it is my duty to LIKE her (ie feel a positive affection towards her) and that I cannot Love her (ie a single-minded love, a pure love) until I have managed to feel affection for her.
Now, I am not saying that I will succeed in this Godly-calling, but that is my sin not hers and it is MY sin that is my concern, not her sin.

From my perspective, you put the sin of having no real affection for the soul called ‘Myra’ against the dreadful crimes she committed and because her crimes are so obviously vile and repulsive, you hope that the sin of not ‘connecting’ with this other human will look almost saintly. Well, to me, it doesn’t. It still seems terrible and horrifying and particularly because it comes in the guise of ‘christianity’ whereas her vile crimes are very clearly what they are: - evil.
Who am I to say which sin is worse or more dangerous? Is it the one that is OBVIOUSLY evil to any sane person, or is it the one that may seduce countless thousands into believing they are being Christ-like whilst comforting themselves that they are in some way morally superior to the other person because that is exactly what I believe we are doing. Yes it is profoundly horrifying. (IMO)

And to you Johnny - and I need to be clear that I am not saying that I have arrived (even in the smallest way) at accomplishing what I believe is the calling of every christian (as above). Far from it! I would imagine that you and others on the forum will be better at practicing what is preached in the NT (IMO) than I am, despite you not believing what I believe.

Love each other with genuine affection (Romans 12 10)

Well, I’ve been pondering this a little for some months now and have finally decided that I think it is not possible to love someone and yet dislike them. Experientially speaking, everyone I love I like, and no one I do not like do I love.

Hi John

Thanks for your response, and for your good wishes. I am delighted to say that Sally, my wife, is now, by God’s grace and blessing, ‘in the clear’ after what has been a very worrying time for us.

Thank you for clarifying what you meant by “the most horrifying concept”. I now see, with as much clarity as I ever see anything :smiley: , where you are coming from. You make some excellent points, many of which I am in agreement with. If you will bear with me, I will come back to you as soon as I can with a detailed response - I need to give what you say some more thought first, and tease out those areas where, perhaps, we may still differ in our opinions.

But I would say now that I too abhor and reject the idea that I am in any way ‘better’ than other people, no matter how ‘badly’ they might have sinned. I am not. The only reason I wouldn’t go so far as to aver, with Paul, that I am the chief of sinners, is because that would be sinful ‘inverse’ pride on my part. And, too, because I believe that I, like every human being, am made in the image of God, am beloved of Him, and that while I should not deny or lessen my own sinfulness and failings, neither should I wallow in them. For if we are to love others as we love ourselves, then we must try and love ourselves first, warts and all, before we can do that. And I agree that when it comes to people we regard as ‘wicked’, even such unfortunates as Myra Hindley, there by the grace of God go any of us.

More very soon.

Blessings to you John

Johnny

:slight_smile: Hi Pilgrim and Johnny

I think a lot of this thread turns on semantics – different people mean different things by ‘love’, ‘like’ and ‘dislike’ (and there is actually probably more agreement than disagreement – despite what is suggested by the voting tallies).

What I mean when I say I ‘like’ someone is that I actually delight in something about them, I feel relaxed in their company, I want to draw close to them in friendship.

When I say I ‘dislike’ – and I very seldom dislike people - it usually means that I am aware of a manipulative, destructive, self seeking intent in that person; and I feel very cautious about drawing close to them or relaxing in their company because I know I need to be very cautious (although some say ‘you should keep your friends close and your enemies even close if you are canny’)

When I say I ‘love’ someone – in the sense of ‘agape’ – I mean that I feel the common bond of humanity with that person (in all the complexity of knowing that the person is created in the image of God, like myself, is a sinner, like myself, and is loved by God , like myself). And even if I dislike a person – for the reasons I have given above – I can still hope for them, and act towards them with good will and without intent to harm.

What I don’t mean by ‘dislike’ is a self righteous appraisal of a another child of God as somehow a lesser being than me who I am able to feel a cold contempt for because I feel they need to be more like me in order to be OK.

I’ve worked with people who have committed horrible crimes. Indeed my dear old colleague who taught me most of what know about community education actually taught Myra Hindley the child killer (she told me that Myra Hidley was actually a rather anxious student, over concerned that her essays were pleasing to teacher, and scrupulous about producing work on time. A thing that made the relationship difficult at first for my colleague was that she was a young Mum with young children when she taught Myra Hindley – but she said she soon forgot about this and just got on with teaching her and trying to get the best out of her). However, I think if I or my colleague had actually had our children killed by Myra Hindley and Ian Brady we would be entitled to feel dislike and we would be on a journey for this to be transformed into another type f relating that might take eternity for completion.

I’ve only ever met one real socio-path. He was a powerful man – the head of an executive training company – and immensely charming; but he destroyed people who thwarted his will. His sister who was a friend of mine disagreed with him over how best to care for their mother who had senile dementia, and he set about destroying her because of this using all the techniques of getting her in a hot temper and then forwarding passionate emails from her to lawyers etc that he could muster (and he had the money to do this stuff – which she hadn’t got). Basically he kept threatening law suits against her – and although these were groundless is made her live in a constant state of fear; tried to isolate her from her extended family by sending his legal threats to all of them, and tried to prevent her from visiting her mother (to whom she was very close – which he wasn’t) as an unfit person. I never confronted him directly - you don’t confront someone like him head on if you want to really help a person who is suffering because of them – but I gave her continuing support with her legal case when the slew of threatening letters and manipulative ploys to wind her up happened, and often did acted as go between with social services when she was in a panic (I’ve had a bit of experience of this from work). Well my friend – who wasn’t a strong person – died of cancer at the young age of 48, two years in to this horrible and undignified fracas (but she did find faith in Christ before she died).

I don’t often think of her brother much now, but I wouldn’t want him close to me, and would find it hard to delight in his company if he’s still the same person. I’d never try to retaliate against him by defaming him or whatever, and I still hope for him. I cannot judge him ultimately for his behaviour – I cannot assess the secret story of his heart – but I don’t like what he did and what he is probably still capable of.

All the best

Dick

I’ve been reading a book about dear Etty Hillesum tonight – The Jewish Christian girl who perished in Auschwitz and left a legacy of love behind in her notebook’. Her last written words were –

‘We should be willing to act as a balm for all wounds’.

As far as I’m concerned Etty put her finger on something that must always go with love – although it is not quite the same as what I would call ‘liking’ (according to my definition of ‘liking’). Agape love is distorted unless it entails a recognition of the common humanity of the other – especially the enemy who is doing you or those whom you love harm.

In the concentration camp Etty wrote – ‘I try to look things straight in the face, even the worst crimes and discover small naked human beings amid the monstrous wreckage caused by man’s senseless deeds’. Patrick Woodhouse writes – ‘Evil she knew, is in the end a mask, a gross distortion, which can entirely obscure the true face of the person underneath, but still only a mask…On the day she could not see a face on the commandant who was sending thousands of Jews to their deaths, but only a long think scar, she did not surrender this conviction. She never gave up hope of seeing –across the chasms of war – the face of the other who is human too. Like us too they are bearers of the Divine image however deeply marred and buried it may be, and so they are people to whom we belong.

Bless you Etty –

Dick

I think you’ve said it, Dick. It’s a matter of the definition of “love”.

It seems to me that Pilgrim sees “love” as an emotion, simply a deeper form of “like”. So with that concept, of course it is impossible to love someone without liking them. But love cannot be an emotion. For Jesus commands us to love our enemies. We cannot obey a command to have a particular emotion. Emotions come and go. There’s no use telling an angry person, “Don’t be angry”. He cannot stop being angry out of compliance with your wishes. There’s no use telling a person with acrophobia, “Don’t be afraid. Just climb up that ladder to the top and do the job!” He can’t change his fear to fearlessness at a command.

If we dislike a person, we can’t change that emotion just because someone tells us to start liking him.

But because loving someone (αγαπαω) is NOT an emotion, but (in my opinion) is performing a beneficent ACT, we can obey the command to act beneficially toward someone, even while disliking the person.

The framers of the online Greek lexicon assumed that the word resembles esteem, rather than spontaneous natural affection. I’m not sure that one can esteem a person whom he dislikes. But one can surely perform acts of kindness (return good for evil) toward one whom he dislikes. When one does so, he often finds that he then begins to like the object of his beneficence.

Here is what the online Greek lexicon says about the two words “φιλεω” (like) and “αγαπαω” (love):

Yes – I agree Piaidon; this turning of the will toward the other – even the depraved and dangerous ‘other’ – is the beginning of the liking that can become real friendship (and if will become real friendship – even if this will only flower fully in eternity).

I take Etty Hillesum as an authority of what it means to persist in love in the face of real extremity – because she actually experienced the challenge of love’s work in an absolute sense. I think agape love as a (re)directing of the will is something that Etty Hillesum is certainly talking about when she speaks of her intention always try to to see the human face of someone, with God’s help, no matter how depraved that person is being in their actions towards her and her people.

I still think there is some sort of complex of emotion and imagination entailed in this act of will (and of ‘seeing’, as Etty puts it) but it is a different complex of emotion and imagination than what I understand ‘liking’ to be, unless we simply mean by ‘liking’ a recognition of ‘likeness’ in common humanity. If that’s what the ‘nay sayers’ to the proposition of this thread mean by ‘like’ then I’d actually agree that we cannot love and dis-like. As I said I think that there is more agreement here than is apparent - it’s just that ‘that of which we speak’ has a qaulity that is diffcult to communicate in words, so we must be patient with each other :slight_smile:

Helpful definitions, thanks!

I’m afraid that life has kept me away from cyberspace and from having time to reply to our community here but I’m hoping to be able to respond to those who have posted in the next few days.

Sherman - what a delight to know that you have been meditating on this theme for some time. Obviously I am also encouraged by your input and that you have joined what is only a small minority including myself. It goes without saying that I agree with you but had you reached a different conclusion I hope that I would have had the good grace to take note of your input. Just the fact that you have given this issue due consideration is worthy of our attention.
God bless

Pilgrim

Hi Michael
Thanks for your input. I hope that you are well over there in Barcelona. I’ve bolded the phrase that stands out to me from your post. I take from that, that it is not Godly to dislike another person. I think that is the whole point of this thread and I couldn’t agree more. You seem to be in agreement with Sherman and myself unless I’ve mistaken you.
God bless

Thanks dear Pilgrim for clarifying your position but I still don’t get it!

  1. Seems to me without you knowing it or without your acknowledging it, you are using agape (contents of, as per Paul in his famous letter in Corinthians) in learning to like “them” to whom you have an aversion´.

  2. Ok I understand your point that it is God’s love working on you, as you are “getting to know them more and more, seeing them in more depth…”. I suggest that, as God works** on** us in our actions towards others (and vice-versa), surely it is God working also through us in our relationships towards others. I guess we would all say that our actions fall short of God’s working on us. But does that mean that God is not working through us when we try? it is through that love and example shown to us by Christ and encouraged by the Holy Spirit, that we are commanded, try, and are sometimes able to “like”, as you would say, and “love”, as most on this thread believe, those to whom we have an aversion, even though our love/like falls short.

  3. I do not think you really mean you would be free of hypocrisy in loving them before you see God’s image in them. Is it not enough that we are told to love our neighbours, and our enemies, supported by Paul and the lives of countless Saints and Martyrs? I don`t think we are told that our love is conditional upon our seeing God’s image in them. Is it not enough to trust God that whatever we may think of others, whatever our like or dislike may be of others, God created all people in His image?

  4. Dear Pilgrim these are just personal thoughts and no need to comment, but you might try reading again for very extensive and helpful posts on this thread from Jason in May this year and his subsequent exchanges!

With affection and love to you brother!

Michael in Barcelona

Dear Pilgrim.

Oh dear!I failed to read this post from you before posting a few minutes ago to you on another earlier one of yours!

But first straightaway I greatly regret that you have mistaken me!!

You can of course take what you yourself understood from my post, but I must clarify that in no way was I getting at whether it is Godly or not Godly to dislike another person. That was NOT my point at all. Your interpretation, though, deviates, in my humble opinion, the whole point of this thread!!

When I said that “I have no doubt that it was Bonhoeffer’s godliness that overcame dislikes he had during his imprisonment”, I was not saying anything more than that. Godliness? Loving? Yes!

But here is one quote from one of Dietrich Bonhoeffer`s fellow prisoners Fabian von Schlabrendorff :

“He (Bonhoeffer) was always good tempered, always of the same kindness and politeness towards everybody, so that to my surprise, within a short time, he had won over his warders, who were not always kindly disposed…” This refers to his “months spent in the cellar of the Gestapo prison at Prinz Albrecht prison " where " hunger, darkness , squalor, and fear…were shot through with rays of hope…” (The Life and Death of Dietrich Bonhoeffer by Mary Bosanquet, Hodder and Stoughton 1968).

Dear Pilgrim and dear Sherman, sorry if I misled you. I am still one of the eighty odd percent on the poll!

Affectionately with love

Michael in Barcelona