The Evangelical Universalist Forum

Christ the Conqueror of Hell: The Descent into Hades from an

As one who was in the EOC, this book among a few others helped me to have the courage of my convictions.

amazon.com/Christ-Conqueror- … 0881410616

Christ the Conqueror of Hell: The Descent into Hades from an Orthodox Perspective.

This in-depth study on the realm of death presents a message of hope held by the first generation of Christians and the early church. Using Scripture, patristic tradition, early Christian poetry, and liturgical texts, Archbishop Hilarion explores the mysterious and enigmatic event of Christ’s descent into Hades and its consequences for the human race. Insisting that Christ entered Sheol as Conqueror and not as victim, the author depicts the Lord s descent as an event of cosmic significance opening the path to universal salvation. He also reveals Hades as a place of divine presence, a place where the spiritual fate of a person may still change. Reminding readers that self-will remains the only hindrance to life in Christ, he presents the gospel message anew, even in the shadow of death.

" . . . yet thyself, O Savior, destroying the power of death, and with thee raising up Adam and releasing ALL men from hell." So sing the faithful in the Evlogetaria just before the resurrection gospel is read in every Sunday Matins service in the Orthodox Church–a perpetual celebration of Easter. Then, at the end of Matins on the Sundays of tones 5-8 this troparia is sung: " . . . O Lord, redeeming ALL men from the snares of the enemy."

What do these shocking words from these hymns mean? How literally, or not literally, are we to understand them? What is the grand, full, historical context of these words? How do we avoid that dreaded doctrine known as “universal salvation”? Or should we indeed avoid it? Is there hope for the rich man (Lk. 16:20-31, the parable of the rich man and Lazarus)?

It is to this topic that Orthodox rising star Archbishop [Metropolitan] Hilarion Alfeyev addresses with full vigor and incredibly detailed research into the voluminous works of Orthodox liturgical theology throughout the centuries. Indeed, it is Alfeyev’s unequivocal mission to “bring justice” to the authoritative place of liturgical theology noting that “Christians celebrated liturgical services long before the appearance of the New Testament . . .” (p. 210) Preceding this there are thorough sections looking at the New Testament, apocryphal literature and patristic writings as well. But the main star of this book is the liturgical theology. Tragically, the bulk of Protestantism has cut itself off from the depth of the wonders and riches of these invaluable sources of spiritual and theological understanding.

Until . . . along came Mars Hill evangelical pastor Rob Hill and his recent book, Love Wins, which set off a flurry of controversy within evangelicalism regarding the existence of hell and the final destination of all people. This was prominently displayed for all on the front cover of the April 14, 2011 issue of Time Magazine. Bell writes, “something new is in the air,” but ironically implies that something OLD is in the air when he says, “At the center of the Christian tradition since the first church, have been a number who insist that history is not tragic, hell is not forever, and love, in the end, wins and all will be reconciled to God.” Did, in fact, Bell actually read the opening, signature quotation in Alfeyev’s book taken from The Vespers of Orthodox Holy Saturday?: “Hell reigns, but not forever, over the race of mortals.”

Indeed, Alfeyev lists the Orthodox fathers (pp. 163-4) who were prominent in these teachings in addition to a wonderful look at St. Gregory of Nyssa, the most prominent Orthodox theologian regarding this subject. In addition St. Isaac the Syrian isn’t overlooked. One can’t help but the refer back to Alfeyev’s previous book, The Spiritual World of St. Isaac the Syrian, where immensely popular Bishop [Met.] Kallistos writes in the Forward “the only interpretation of judgement and hell that makes any sense.” (p. 10)

In his impressive statistical analysis of the vast array of liturgical texts Alfeyev cites an impressive 75% of these texts as all inclusive of the human race being the object of Christ’s work in hell. Indeed, “The teaching that Christ trampled on death by death, abolished the power of the devil, and DESTROYED HELL–is general church doctrine.” (p.209) Having said this, Alfeyev, in no uncertain terms, vigorously upholds that other pillar of Christian belief–freedom of the will–with a fascinating psychological twist on the effects of love on contrasting groups of people. He also concludes that “there are no easy, simple answers.” (p. 193)

Hi rmmahoney,
I should read Alfeyev’s book. In my own book and blog, I quoted his 2002 speech:
orthodoxeurope.org/page/11/1/5.aspx

One-clicked that tome just now. :mrgreen:

Jason,

I am literally listening to you cross examine TFan and all I can say is wow. Really? Romans 9 and Job? really? :unamused:

I kind-of applaud him for at least attempting to find something else Romans 9 could be referencing. I suspect it was listed in the margin of his Bible. I’m at least half-sure it was in mine, too–I didn’t mention it because topically the connections are very sparse. Trying to present that as being the exclusive reference over-against the other four possibilities/probabilities, was certainly desperate, though. :wink:

But at least he did try to address my contextual argument there (and in some other places, like in our 2 Thess discussion), which is more than I can say for what he didn’t try to do elsewhere (like in our Matt 25 discussion). :slight_smile:

Anyway, thanks for the pointer toward Archbishop Hilarion’s book. I’m mainly after it as a sourcebook for references on how authors (including of liturgies) treated the descent into hades during patristic times.

What is funny is that many of the hymns and Kontakions that were composed during the patristic times are still sung and used today.

I think the part that made me chuckle a bit was how TFan just dug in those heels and did not want to go where Mark 9 and everyone being salted with fire was going to take him. He must be on a low sodium diet. :laughing:

ON THE VICTORY OF THE CROSS
BY THE HUMBLE ROMANOS

The sword of flame no longer guards the gate of Eden,
For a strange bond came upon it: the wood of the Cross.
The sting of Death and the victory of Hades were nailed to it.
But you appeared, my Saviour, crying to those in Hades:
‘Be brought back Again to Paradise’.

Nailed to the form of the Cross
As truly a ransom for many
You redeemed us, Christ our God,
For by your precious blood in love for mankind
You snatched our souls from death.
You brought us back with you
Again to Paradise.

All things in heaven and earth rightly rejoice with Adam,
Because he has been called
Again to Paradise.

Three crosses Pilate fixed on Golgotha,
Two for the thieves and one for the Giver of life,
Whom Hades saw and said to those below,
‘My ministers and powers,
Who has fixed a nail in my heart?

A wooden lance has suddenly pierced me and I am being torn apart.
My insides are in pain, my belly in agony.
My senses make my spirit tremble,
And I am compelled to disgorge
Adam and Adam’s race, given me by a tree,
A tree is bringing them back
Again to Paradise’.

When he heard this the cunning serpent,
Ran crawling and cried, ‘Hades, what is it?
Why do you groan for no reason? Why produce these wailings?
This tree, at which you tremble,
I carpentered up there for Mary’s child.
I intimated it to the Jews for our advantage,
For it is a cross, to which I have nailed Christ
Wishing by a tree to do away with the second Adam.
So do not upset yourself. It will not plunder you.
Keep hold of those you have. Of those whom we rule
Not one escapes Again to Paradise.’

‘Away with you, come to your senses, Beliar’, cries Hades
‘Run, open your eyes, and see
The root of the tree inside my soul.
It has gone down to my depths,
To draw up Adam like iron.
Elissaios of old painted its image in prophecy
When he drew the axe head from the river.
With a light object the prophet dragged a heavy
Warning you, and teaching you
That by a tree Adam is to be brought up
From wretchedness Again to Paradise.’

‘Who gave you such an idea, Hades?
Whence now this cowardly fear, where once there was no fear,
Of a worthless tree, dry and barren
Made for the removal
Of malefactors and those who welcome bloodshed?
For Pilate discovered it, persuaded by my counsels.
And do you fear it, and reckon it powerful?
The universal executioner : will it in your view prove a saviour?
Who has misled you? Who has persuaded you
That he who fell by a tree is being raised by a tree,
And, that he may dwell there, is being called
Again to Paradise.’

‘You have suddenly lost your senses, you of old the cunning serpent.
All your wisdom has been swallowed up through the Cross
And you have been caught in your own snare.
Lift up your eyes and see
That you have fallen into the pit which you created.
Behold that tree, which you call dry and barren,
Bears fruit, having tasted which a thief
Has become heir to the good things of Eden.
For it has outdone the rod
Which led the people out of Egypt,
For it is bringing Adam back
Again to Paradise.’

‘Wretched Hades, cease this cowardly talk,
For these words of yours reveal your thoughts.
Were you afraid of a cross and of the crucified?
Not one of your words has shaken me,
For these deeds are part of my plan,
For I would again both open a grave and entomb Christ.
So you may enjoy your cowardice double,
From his tomb as well as from his cross.
But when I see you, I shall mock you.
For when Christ is buried I shall come to you and say,
“Who now is bringing Adam back
Again to Paradise?”’

Suddenly Hades began to call out to the devil—
The eyeless to the sightless, the blind to the blind—‘Look,
You are walking in darkness, feel around, lest you fall.
Consider what I tell you, hard of heart,
Because what you are doing has quenched the sun.
For the tree which you boast of has shaken the universe,
Has convulsed the earth, hidden the sky,
Rent the rocks together with the Veil,
And raised up those in the graves.
And the dead are shouting, “Hades, understand.
For Adam is running back
Again to Paradise.”’

‘Has the Nazarene’s tree been strong enough to scare you?’
Said the devil to Hades the destroyer,
‘Have you been slain by a cross, you who slay all?
Truly if a tree has scared you,
The crucifixion of Haman should have frightened you,
And that stake with which Jael did away with Sisera,
And the five crosses to which Jesus son of Navi
Once fixed the tyrants.
More than all let the plant in Eden
Scare you, because it led out
Adam, yet does not lead him back
Again to Paradise.’

‘Now is the moment for you to open your ears, Beliar.
Now the hour will show you the power of the cross
And the great authority of the crucified.
For you the cross is folly, But for all creation it is seen as a throne,
Nailed on which Jesus, as though seated,
Hears the thief crying to him,
“Lord, remember me in your kingdom”,
And answers as from a tribunal,
“Today, poor beggar, you will reign with me.
For with me you will go in
Again to Paradise.”’

When he heard this, the all-resourceful dragon,
He began to wilt, and what he had heard he saw,
A thief witnessing to Christ crucified.
And so, astounded at this
He strikes his breast and argues,
‘He speaks to a thief, yet does not answer his accusers?
To Pilate he never deigned so much as a word,
Now he addresses a murderer, saying, “Come, live in pleasure”?
What is this? Who has seen
On the cross words or deeds from the thief
By means of which he is taking
This man to Paradise?’

A second time the demon raised the same cry
Calling out, ‘Hades, receive me. My recourse is to you,
For I submit to your views, I who did not believe them.
I saw the tree at which you shuddered
Crimsoned with blood and water.
And I shuddered, not, I tell you, at the blood, but at the water.
For the former shows the slaughter of Jesus,
But the latter, his life, because life has gushed
From his side. For it was not the first
But the second Adam who made Eve,
The mother of all living, bud
With words like these the wholly wicked one
Grudgingly admitted that he had fallen along with Hades.
And so, of course, together they bewail their fall,
‘What’, he says, ‘is this to which we have brought ourselves?
How have we fallen by this tree?
For our destruction its stock was rooted in the earth.
We grafted to it bitter shoots.
The sweetness in it we did not transform’.
‘Alas, my comrade’. ‘Alas, my companion’.
‘As we have fallen together. So let us grieve,
For Adam is going back
Again to Paradise.’

O how did we not remember the types of this tree!
For of old they were shown forth in many and various ways
In the saved and in the lost.
By a tree Noah was saved,
But the whole world, unbelieving, was destroyed.
Moses was glorified through one when he took a staff as a sceptre,
But Egypt, with the plagues that came from it,
Was drowned as though fallen into deep wells.
What it has now done, the Cross showed forth
Of old in image. How then can we not weep?
For Adam is going
Again to Paradise.’

‘Wait, wretched Hades’, said the demon with a groan,
‘Quiet, be patient, lay hand on mouth,
For I hear a voice revealing joy.
A sound has reached me bringing good tidings,
A rustle of words like the leaves of the Cross.
For Christ at the point of death cried out, “Father, forgive them”.
But he grieved me when he then said
That “the lawless know not what they do”.
But we know that it is the Lord
Of glory who is suffering and that he wishes
To bring Adam back
Again to Paradise.’

‘Did not the Master by the tree he showed to Moses,
Which once sweetened the water at Mara,
Teach what it was and what its root?
Then he did not say, for it was not his will.
But now he has made it clear to all.
For see, all things have been made pleasant, but we have been embittered.
A cross which was thrust into the earth
Has sprouted from our root, which became sweet.
That which formerly bred thorns
Now like a vine of Sorec has put out branches
Which are transplanted
Again to Paradise.’

‘Now therefore, Hades, groan and I will harmonise with your wails.
Let us lament as we see the tree which we planted
Transformed into a holy trunk,
Beneath which have sheltered
And will nest in its branches
Thieves, murderers, and publicans and harlots, that they may reap
Sweet fruit from the supposedly arid.
For as to a plant of life they cling to the Cross.
Pressed against it and swimming,
Through it they escape and are brought for anchorage
As to a fair haven
Again to Paradise.’

‘Swear then, tyrant, finally to crucify no one.’
‘And you, Tartarus, make a firm decision to slay no one.’
‘We have had our experience, let us draw in our hand.
May what we have undergone become for us
Knowledge for the future.
Let neither of us henceforth tyrannise against the race of Adam,
For it has been sealed by the Cross, like a treasure
Containing an unravished pearl in a corruptible vessel,
Which a thief, well-suited to his trade,
Ravished on the cross. For stealing he was nailed up,
And for thieving he was called
Again to Paradise.’

Most high and glorious, God of fathers and of youths,
Your willing outrage has become our honour.
For in your Cross we all boast.
To it let us nail our hearts,
That on it we may hang our instruments
And sing to you, the Lord of all, from the songs of Sion.
The ship from Tharsis once upon a time
Brought gold to Solomon, as it is written.
To us your Tree gives back
Every day and moment wealth beyond price,
For it brings us all
Again to Paradise.

I still think I could have handled that part better during the cross-exam phase. Which is too bad because it’s one of my Big Guns, and was the first verse that really struck me between the eyes when I finally saw it.

I knew the famous Pauline things of course, and the parable of the 100th sheep/10th coin, and a few other things of that sort. I already knew that those would naturally be fitted in–I wouldn’t have to ‘explain those away’ anymore. It was Mark 9:49-50, in context, that was the first big punch for me. I was surprised to find it so rarely referred to, when I finally began reading other universalist works. (I only started doing that after several years of study on my own, partly because the internet was still rather new for broad public access back when I was first starting, and partly because I wanted to come at the matter fresh against my own predispositions instead of reading how people already convinced regarded matters.)

Oh well, next time. :slight_smile:

Meanwhile, that dramatic poem you posted up was excessively awesome! (You should repost it in the poetry section where it can have more attention, too.)