Well, theists generally are OK with God granting humans free will, even though free will almost inevitably leads to evil. In a similar way, God could use evolution, even though evolution almost inevitably leads to suffering.
I say almost inevitably because there is nothing inherently contradictory about free will not causing evil, just as there is nothing inherently contradictory about evolution not leading to suffering.
Perhaps God gave a large measure of free will to all of creation, including evolution. The randomness of quantum physics seem to suggest this is so.
I just can’t reconcile the description of all-encompassing and unconditional love people report in near-death experiences, and descriptions of what God is supposed to be, with a God who would intentionally subject any of his creations to annihilation or extinction. So, the essential kenosis and open-theist world view makes the most sense to me.
Alternatively, I could see that happening if the creatures were going to pose too much of a threat to other creatures in the environment (i.e. mammals) or if said creatures were oblivious to God and could not feel love.
This Got Questions essay, brings up some interesting points
Let me quote a bit:
The topic of dinosaurs in the Bible is part of a larger ongoing debate within the Christian community over the age of the earth, the proper interpretation of Genesis, and how to interpret the physical pieces of evidence we find all around us. Those who believe in older age for the earth tend to agree that the Bible does not mention dinosaurs, because, according to their paradigm, dinosaurs died out millions of years before the first man ever walked the earth. The men who wrote the Bible could not have seen living dinosaurs.
Those who believe in a younger age for the earth tend to agree that the Bible does mention dinosaurs, though it never actually uses the word “dinosaur.” Instead, it uses the Hebrew word tanniyn , which is translated a few different ways in our English Bibles. Sometimes it’s “sea monster,” and sometimes it’s “serpent.” It is most commonly translated “dragon.” The tanniyn appear to have been some sort of giant reptile. These creatures are mentioned nearly thirty times in the Old Testament and were found both on land and in the water.
So, are there dinosaurs in the Bible? The matter is far from settled. It depends on how you interpret the available pieces of evidence and how you view the world around you. If the Bible is interpreted literally, a young earth interpretation will result, and the idea that dinosaurs and man coexisted can be accepted. If dinosaurs and human beings coexisted, what happened to the dinosaurs? While the Bible does not discuss the issue, dinosaurs likely died out sometime after the flood due to a combination of dramatic environmental shifts and the fact that they were relentlessly hunted to extinction by man.
Here’s an “interesting” battle, I found on YouTube - involving dinosaurs and my “favorite” topic!
Here’s the thing, I don’t take the Bible literally, especially because the timelines are so far off from what we know is scientifically true. Dinosaurs died out over 60 million years ago and man was still very far off in the future, this doesn’t coincide with the Biblical timeline of the flood at all. The last major flood of the Earth that we know of was about 11,000 years ago, caused by flooding from melting glaciers after what was likely a meteor impact that drove up global temperatures. This could well be the flood accounted for in the Bible, but it was far after the time of the dinos.
It should cast doubt, at the very least, on creationism and intelligent design.
There are subjective presuppositions in dating methods:
https://forum.evangelicaluniversalist.com/t/evolution-the-flood-and-god-s-true-nature/6012/32
https://forum.evangelicaluniversalist.com/t/evolution-the-flood-and-god-s-true-nature/6012/140
And as for God’s plans for animals, we read about their coming restoration in Isaiah,
Is. 11:6
The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them.Is. 65:25
The wolf and the lamb will feed together, and the lion will eat straw like the ox, and dust will be the serpent’s food. They will neither harm nor destroy on all my holy mountain,”
Blessings.
Being raised NEARLY a fundamentalist, I was told that Dinosaurs were Satan like creatures and God killed them to make way for us. The other mixed belief was Ken Ham’s ridiculous viewpoint - That Dinosaurs were alive and well, and then the flood killed them all, except for the small ones, which were brought on the Ark. Watching his Ark demonstration, I couldn’t help but think that even our advanced society could barely pull that off, if at all. It seems rather unlikely that the narrative of Noah based on Ken Ham’s interpretation is correct.
For record, I am referring to the Ark in Kentucky or Ohio, I can’t remember what state it is in, but I went there, toured it and found more ideas not found in the Bible than a typical atheist evolutionist. I couldn’t believe how much extra biblical stuff Ken Ham expounds on for passages in the Bible. Creative, definitely! But conjecture and straining…
What asteroid? It’s a mere figment of a fertile imagination. Dinosaurs, apart from two on the Ark, were wiped out in the Noahic flood.
This to me raises two separate questions. Firstly the bible refers to some sort of fall associated with the devil. Whatever that was the practical result is that the world as we see it is the crash site, not the first class lounge. We know quite a lot about what happened, and not very much about what would have happened without a fall. Would there be mass extinctions, or wasps, or income tax in an unfallen world?
Secondly, what is the relationship of God to time? What if continuous intervention by God, and leaving it to chance, aren’t the only options? I hope you can forgive my including a passage from a SF novel that touches on this. Tom is an alien time-traveller and Dan is a schoolkid from Earth:
(Dan) I thought for a moment. “You chose the moment that gave you the best probability of- No, that sounds wrong.”
Tom smiled. “Probability is just another word for not knowing. Toss a coin, heads or tails? Probability says both are equally likely, time travel tells you which. We know that if I arrived on a certain date, with a particular appearance, in this place, your people would survive and go on to build galactic empires that last for millennia. We didn’t know how, or who would get hurt. We did know that it would work, and that if we didn’t do it you all died out.”
“Just like that?”
“Yes. We look for the best end result, and on the way the right coincidences happen. We didn’t know about Professor Steele in advance, we just knew that if we picked that set of rooms for our meetings something happened. We didn’t know what until after it had.”
Interesting thought…
Well, that raises the question - what is time? Is it like philosopher Immanual Kant saw it? Albert Einstein saw it? As a zombie from Z-Hell (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) - might see it?
Should we look to the philosophers, theologians, and physicists first - for a definition of time?
Or perhaps we should ask some musicians - like the Rolling Stones?
I might not respond, for a few hours. As I’ll be out - “killing time”.
Got Questions does a great service, by answering many Biblical and theological questions. But they do have a theological and biblical exegesis, that they ground themselves in. However, the information they provide - is a good starting point. And it provides both information and food for thought.
Currently, i look at everything through EC/EO theology. But I’m also an Old Earth and Big Bang proponent. And agnostic on evolutionary theory.
Only under the evolutionary scenario do these things make sense.
Cool I like it.
It’s the theology, of the Eastern Catholics and Eastern Orthodox. My bad. I like to abbreviate and not everyone would be familiar, with my abbreviations.
By the end of the sixth day, after God finished creating everything that has been created so far (including angels earlier in the week), we read that,
“God saw all that he had made, and it was very good . And there was evening, and there was morning—the sixth day.” Genesis 1:31.
Some time passed, and then we read about the serpent (Satan né Lucifer), a temptation to eat from the forbidden bipolar tree, and then sin and “death”—which came in through one man (Rom. 5:12, 1 Cor. 15:21) subsequent to the Creation being completely good. So how could the mechanism of “survival of the fittest”–which involves so much death–have been active before man sinned?
As I said elsewhere,
In “Charles Darwin and the Satan he saw in Nature,” Richard Murray argues that a focus on the horror of “natural evil” in nature helped destroy Darwin’s faith.
He says (my emphasis),
Having a bi-polar “mother nature” can either rob us of our faith in God, as it did Charles Darwin, or it can strengthen our resolve that “natural evil” is a deformation frequently caused by hostile unseen cosmic forces.
Oookay, well, bringing it back to reality where we have zero confirmation that the Bible is literally vs metaphorically true (at least when it comes to pre-history) or of the existence of malign spiritual entities…
We know from modern science that it is the laws of physics, which govern the entire universe, that create the natural “evils” (disasters) we see. But perhaps the problem isn’t in their existence, it’s in how we think of them. Microbes, viruses, earthquakes, hurricanes, none of them are inherently “evil,” we just define them as such based on our (and other living things’) relationship to them.
But, while hurricanes and wildfires and earthquakes and tornadoes are destructive and dangerous, they also help to keep the natural balance in the ecosystems, maintain soil enrichment, and cleanse and renew ecosystems for eventual rebirth. They are products of a dynamic, not a static, planet, and death and renewal are going to be a natural part of that dynamic system. Meanwhile, microbes that are deadly to us are either not deadly or a boon to other species, like turkey vultures. And we’re learning that viruses can be genetically modified to combat other types of disease like cancer and AIDS.
I’ve come to believe more and more that we live in a universe of balance, and that this balance is important for the expression of free will and for the development of character.
What? You mean mosquitoes don’t have souls? In that case, I won’t have to feel guilty any more in swatting them to death and thus sending them to hell. 
Christian evolutionists like Catholic Kenneth Miller rightly reject both creationism and form of Intelligent Design theory that espouses the "God of the gaps.’ but they view the original act of creation as an event governed by a divine sovereignty that made the evolution of homo sapiens inevitable. In other words, (1) the need for a solar system in which countless asteroids zoom towards earth was essential to God’s plan and (2) the asteroid annihilation of the dinosaurs was providentially essential to the possibility that we could evolve and survive predation. My main quibble with evolutionary theory is its failure to account for the role of unknown laws of consciousness which I’m confident played a decisive role in evolution. Natural selection and genetic mutation, though essential, were not in my view enough.,
I have 3 related questions for readers:
(1) If the history of the planet is the story of evolution, then is it reasonable to assume:
(a) that God Himself is in flux and in that sense evolves;
(b) that the afterlife realms are also in flux and evolve?
(2) If so, does that mean that Open Theism should be the foundation of our theology?
(3) Can you guess which Bible verse on creation is compatible with evolutionary theory?
Can God learn? What an interesting thought!
Evolutionary theory teaches that Mother Nature operates through it’s own fixed laws and evolves life forms through random natural selection and genetic mutation. In Proverbs 8:30-31 Lady Wisdom speaks as if “She” is a Person distinct from God and helps shape creation through divine play. Thus her role in creation parallels that of “Mother Nature” because the image of divine “play” is compatible with the image of divine exploration, nonpurposive activity, and evolutionary dead ends:
Proverbs 8:30-31: I (Lady Wisdom) was beside the master craftsman, delighting him day after day, ever at play in his presence, at play everywhere on his earth, delighting to be with the children of men."
The quote is from the New Jerusalem Bible which best captures the subtle nuances of the underlying Hebrew of 8:30-31.
But why would Lady Wisdom speak as if “She” were a distinct personality from God? To convey the idea that Nature operates impersonally according to Her fixed laws, whereas our loving “God” relates to humanity “personally” when we seek a relationship with “Him.”