Really? every single one Bob? Sara Sanders, Joni Ernst , a few dozen more i could list?
Well, this is interesting - from the BBC news. 
And we have some sports news, from Weekly World News.
And what did âmummy,â say?
I find that this adjective is more often raised about women who challenge Trump, than it is for men.
Do you really see Ms. Sanders and Sen. Ernst as examples of being ânon-compliantâ toward Trump and as having run against him on anything? I see few very GOP leaders, women or men, who have the cojones to oppose Trumpâs desires on anything.
Whatâs new in the BBC news? Boy, this trial sure is âexcitingâ.
And the UK might be a bit mad, at the US.
Now back to the senators!
Really?, i find it was actually used once or twice but then repeatedly brought up by Trump haters every chance they get.
How about Jeff Sessions? or Mitt Romney? Also the fact that Dems are way over the top in opposing him on anything and everything, i think it tends to spur Repubs to defend him when they normally would not.
Really? I didnât bring it up. Like Trump, you are the one who brought it up as your only evaluation of a woman challenging Trump. Are you a Trump hater? If you hear Trump haters saying it, you must listen to more Trump hating sources than I do.
Thatâs a perfect example! Sessions pursued Trumpâs policy desires on everything, except his desire to have him block investigating Russiaâs election interference. Where did that land him? In constant tweets of ridicule and then being fired!
Most GOP Senators know that Trump will similarly seek to destroy them if they likewise refuse to be cowards and stand up for the truth. I wouldnât hold my breath for any more true conservatives showing courage. They know you end up being a Flake (like Jeff) or out of Sessions (like Jeff).
I personally would defend him anyway - based on performance. All this high-falutinâ talk about a âmountain of evidenceâ is, to be fair, bushwa. No witnesses, no paperwork trail, no nothing except the transcript and the one âwitnessâ who said T told him that âhe did not want anything from Ukraineâ.
Affection for perceptions of his âperformanceâ has nothing to do with whether he committed a crime.
So Bob, Trump said he is the greatest supporter of unborn babies ever to occupy the White House, what is Amy Klobucharâs position on unborn babies?
Every time there is no way to defend Trumpâs record, it comes down to insisting nothing matters but that he supposedly is stopping abortion.
Klobucharâs position is that parents stopping a pregnancy by abortion should not be criminalized. I disagree with her, and personally think itâs the murderous hit on a child, but no president is going to achieve charging those who order such a hit with that, or will stop abortions.
But I sympathize that a life long supporter of choice like Trump has reduced you to only defending his wider record by thinking you will get criminalization of abortion from him.
Bob you are even more confused then usual. I have said education and better technology showing fetuses (unborn babies) are really human beings is the answer which Jesus would have concurred. I donât know of anyone who is for criminalization. I think this issue is what they call a red herring. Sort of something brought up when you have no other point to make.
So Klobuchar is against criminalization for abortions, very impressive but what does she think about abortions. I mean at least if you support some kind of educational process regarding what an abortion really is it appears to disqualify you from being a Democrat contender or office holder.
1 Like
Letâs visit the BBC, to see whatâs happening.
Well, I donât know about Africans. But zombies love Trump!
And someone mentioned this joke. Iâll share it in passing.
Whiplash! You may want to keep abortion safe and legal. But I actually know many whose hope is requiring a court thatâd kill the Roe vs. Wade law that declares abortion legal, in order for legislation to make it a crime. As I said, since I see it as killing a human being, I personally sympathize, and sympathized with Trump when he claimed heâd punish women who contract for a thing that serious.
So you are quite a bit more liberal. But I salute your emphasis on education. That is the key which is already changing views about the unbornâs personhood, and I would oppose any Democrat that would stop the freedom of ministries that offer education and alternatives to anyone considering abortion. Some I discipled in my church wonderfully provide sonograms, full info and support. I salute them!
What are all those Dems doing behind Trump? (good-natured ribbing).
If Trump does win In November, do Democrats think they will get behind him - or are they willing to hold the entire electorate hostage because of their hissy fit, for another 4 years?
Probably as passionately as Republicans got behind Obama.
Now, this is interesting. And it hasnât reached the BBC news yet.
Oh who even cares anymore? The Dems are just playing with themselves, unfortunately at our expense.