Yep & I agree, but the question is what happens when they do become the ruling group 
I have tried not to think about it but censorship is a possibility. 
Perhaps thereâs no proof that Trump colluded with them, but there is plenty of evidence that Russia influenced the election:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections
vox.com/world/2017/7/18/15992680/trump-supporters-russia-poll-believe
There are many more sites, but my internet is slow as molasses tonight. However, you can get the other sites by googling âproof that russia influenced the election.â
Perhaps thereâs no proof that Trump colluded with them, but there is plenty of evidence that Russia influenced the election:
Yes but these are two separate issues that âthe leftâ likes to present as blended
Of particular interest was their releasing TRUE documents concerning corruption on the Democratic side.
The Truth could be called interfering, but not by me.
Truth Revolt:
quote
Set aside everything else about this entire contentious debate and can this be viewed as anything other than an admission of politically motivated treason.
The Obama administration didnât respond more forcefully to Russian hacking before the presidential election because they didnât want to appear to be interfering in the election and they thought that Hillary Clinton was going to win and a potential cyber war with Russia wasnât worth it, multiple high-level government officials told NBC News.
âThey thought she was going to win, so they were willing to kick the can down the road,â said one U.S official familiar with the level of Russian hacking.
Again, letâs set aside everything else.
We have admissions by top government officials that they didnât do anything about the hacking because they thought Hillary would win. If they thought Hillary would lose, as she did, they would have done something.
Their basis for responding to a threat isnât national interest, but party interest.
end quote
And as for interfering with foreign elections - Obama did in at least 6 instances. HmmmmâŚnot reported much, eh?
quote
Why such silence from the media that obsesses over alleged Russian interference in our elections?
While the media obsess over an alleged Russian conspiracy to collude with Donald Trump to affect Americaâs 2016 presidential election, what about Obamaâs interference in the elections of other countries? Most Americans have no idea that President Obama meddled in elections all over the world. And apparently, the media decided thereâs no reason for Americans to know about this illegal activity.
Indeed, in 2016, the Los Angeles Times did a story on how America has interfered with other nationâs elections in the past, but they stopped short of mentioning the various foreign elections Obama tried to influence. But the same article reports that Obama âslapped Russia with new penalties for meddling in the U.S. Presidential election⌠by hacking into Democratic and Republican computer networks and selectively releasing emails.â Hypocrisy check, anyone?
end quote
full article : spectator.org/obamas-meddling-i ⌠-examples/
I noticed something pretty shocking. I now get my news from Fox News, CNN, the BBC, WFMT radio and the Supermarket Tabloids. But there used to be several supermarket tabloids. Now there is only the National Enquirer. And I checked several stores. Perhaps Trump is secretly buying up these Supermarket Tabloids and shutting them downâŚto keep them from printing the real scoops 
And speaking of the BBC. Hereâs something Iâve shared on Twitter today:
Killer robots: Experts warn of âthird revolution in warfareâ
Is President Trump secretly, preparing an army of killer robots? I canât confirm this in the tabloids
Just program in Asimovâs 3 laws of robotics and weâll be fine.
Of course, he was an older fat white man, so I just outed myself as a hater, homophobe, racist etc⌠
WEllâŚ
Just out of curiosity, Dave, how do you regard Adolph Hitler? Were he and his NAZI Party, ultra-right ⌠or ultra-left⌠or neither?
Don - I think he ran on a ârightyâ platform, your law and order theme. Go far enough left or right, though, and you pretty much end up in the same place -totalitarianism.
Your thoughts?
A little history about the name-calling accusing one party of being Hitlerian:
Just out of curiosity, Dave, how do you regard Adolph Hitler? Were he and his NAZI Party, ultra-right ⌠or ultra-left⌠or neither?
Well NAZI stands for National Socialist German Workers Party so the name actually suggests âleftistâ and ârightestâ leanings.
That could be right, actually. So to speak.
Iâm more intrigued on why Don would even ask me the question.
On a story showing where our culture is going, ESPN a sports network known to be politically liberal transferred a sports announcer off a football game in Virginia because his name is Robert Lee. They didnât want to âoffendâ anyone except of course Robert Lee. Of course the fact Robert Lee is Asian didnât dissuade ESPN.
This s/b a joke but it isnât!
Hi Dave,
Okay, Iâll confess. I asked you the question because I have noticed that people that are far to the right on the political spectrum usually perceive Hitler as having been ultra left-wing, while the majority of people consider him to have been ultra right-wing. I have the impression from your posts that you are right-wing to quite a degree (I wonât say âultra right-wingâ). But my impression may be incorrect. So I thought Iâd ask this question to either support that impressionâor not.
Thatâs what I thought, and thatâs fine.
I assure you that I think for myself as best I can - and at this time it appears to me that Leftists - not liberals, true Lefties - are outta their minds, have no sense any longer of civil discourse, rely entirely on the politics of identity, and will lie or anything else to pursue their vision.
I say that as a neutral party, Don - the only dog I have in the fight is trying to figure out what the hell the truth is.
I am not a white supremacist, nor KKK friendly, not racist to the best of my knowledge - in fact I detest all of those things.
If I seem far-right to you, itâs because Iâve pointed out the irrational and immoral conduct of the Leftists - not the liberals - which conduct will probably bring down the nation.
Itâs kinda funny - the nation on earth that (almost) everyone wants to move to, is the nation the Left calls the most evil in the world. I cannot abide that kind of hypocrisy.
Sorry - almost got wound up there. The lies, the race-baiting, the corruption of the school system all the way to the universities, the deliberate weakening of our national strength, the abandonment of the First Amendment - and on an on - well these things affect our lives, and we ainât seen nothinâ yet.
I am not Far Right.
1 Like
Must I be far right to find this (and I can provide many more equally destructive accounts) troubling, and wondering what the agenda is:
Parents in Rocklin, California were horrified to discover that a teacher led a kindergarten-age classroom discussion on transgenderism that included introducing a five-year-old who was transitioning from male to female.
Children at Rocklin Academy were subjected to readings from two storybooks about transgenderism. At some point, the teacher introduced a classmate who changed clothes for the big gender reveal.
Click here for a free subscription to Toddâs newsletter: a must-read for Conservatives!
âThese parents feel betrayed by the school district that they were not notified,â Capitol Resource Instituteâs Karen England told CBS News in Sacramento. âThe kindergartners came home very confused, about whether or not you can pick your gender, whether or not they really were a boy or a girl.â
Parents were not given advance notice of the lesson nor were they given the opportunity to opt-out of the classroom activity.
âMy daughter came home crying and shaking so afraid she could turn into a boy,â one parent told CBS News.
The school district defended the lesson â saying the books were age-appropriate. The district also said under state law they are not required to notify parents when their children are being indoctrinated on gender identity. Additionally, the district said parents do not have the right to opt-out of the classroom discussions.
Teachers also defended the controversial classroom discussion.
âWhen we head in the direction of banned books or book lists, or selective literatureâ that should only be read inside or outside the classroom, I think thatâs a very dangerous direction to go,â Kelly Bryson told CBS.
1 Like
This just came in, from the BBC News website:
Trump says he is willing to âclose governmentâ to build Mexico wall
I am very happy to see this. It means we have elected a president, who sets his priorities straight 
Of course, some here would call it âfake newsâ And ONLY Fox News, is capable of âjournalistic objectivityâ
Trump is sabre-rattling with an effective tactic of the past⌠âlĂźgenpresse!!â 