I think you overstep the bounds of presumption with that remark.
I will also say that very many things I have said recently you have failed to address because they were too hard for your theology - but then I would be overstepping the mark of presumption (so I won’t say it)
Explain to me how you ‘know’ I pretend to believe in nothing? I can comment on the validity of an argument without believing that argument necessarily says anything about objective reality. I presume you don’t have psychic powers that can read my thoughts.
For example
I can make the observation that the story of the Lord Of The Rings is ultimately about friendship and loyalty rather than good versus evil without believing that the quest for the ring ever happened in reality.