I was pointed to the series of articles, critiquing Ramelli and Konstan’s book Terms of Eternity. I do not know if this has been brought to the attention of the forum or not. I’d very much like to hear what you all think about the author’s arguments. TIA.
Yep, there is a post already about it.
[What do you make of /u/koine_lingua's arguments? (Part 1))
Not sure what to make of his arguments. The problem I have with them, is I never truly know quite where he is coming from. Hard to follow, IMO. I’d also suggest he refute the work of Hansen, to help illustrate where he sees some fallacies.