The Evangelical Universalist Forum

The Ragamuffin Gospel

Eaglesway, Christ didn’t have to die in order to forgive people; He forgave people when He walked this earth prior to His death:

*Matthew 9:2 And behold, some people brought to him a paralytic, lying on a bed. And when Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, “Take heart, my son; your sins are forgiven.”

Mark 2:5 And when Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, “My son, your sins are forgiven.”

Luke 7:48 And he said to her, “Your sins are forgiven.”*

But it took Jesus’ death in order to effect deliverance from the self-life and transformation.

I hear you say this Don, AND IF that was strictly what you meant I would agree, BUT… your own words on the forum seem to testify against this, at least in terms of semantics WHEN elsewhere you clearly state according to your view that… repentance is the prerequisite to escape or find release from a postmortem fire i.e., your oft state ‘salted with fire’ (by any other understanding = hell or lake of fire), aka corrective discipline. But NONE of that idea or concept is germane to Jesus’ death with regards to humanity.

And this he did, period (Heb 9:26); this is not something STILL outworking through humanity. You confuse sinful type ACTIONS, as opposed to the condition of sin itself… two different things entirely.

What God’s singular Cross-Parousia event established on-behalf-of ALL Israel AND THEN humanity WAS the permanent removal of the condition of sin in terms of “guilt” as it stood over and against Israel and humanity, experienced in terms of separation from GodTHAT separation is gone; ALL has been reconciled and God is at peace with His creation, i.e., the world. When man “wakes up” to this reality (through the gospel) he catches up to this reality — so it is that repentance facilitates the grasping of this reality.

Again, it is the sin condition that God dealt with in Christ (Jn 1:29) NOT the ability to “miss and thus fall short of the mark” (the doing action of sin) — something we all in that vein will do till the day we step through death’s doorway into God’s greater blessedness beyond.

Paul in Romans said… “for by the law is the knowledge of sin” — by this he meant the condition of sin (the noun), not the verb; he deals with the verb here: “What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? Certainly not!” The removal of the “condition” (noun) in terms of the “guilt” does not mean one cannot practice wrongdoing (verb). This is why James exhorts the brethren to “confess your sins” (<ἁμαρτίας> hamartias / verb) NOT to God :astonished: BUT “to one another”… thus allowing His restorative healing to flow.

Actually as I understand it… technically the “deliverance from the self-life and transformation” for believers is due to Jesus’ resurrection; his death wrought for humanity ‘the reconciliation’ as per…

When ‘enemies’ his death reconciled humanity, and then in consequence to those “much more” responding in repentant faith came/comes the “deliverance from the self-life and transformation” IN LIFE because of “His life” i.e., his resurrection.

Davo, I don’t think “repentance is the prerquisite to escape or find release from a postmortem fire” is what I stated or implied.

When I say, “Jesus didn’t die to save us from hell or punishment,” I am speaking of the concept of “hell” and “punishment” that is commonly understood as being penalty for wrongdoing. This is a totally separate concept from the reality of God’s remediation of sinners. If one has lived his whole life for self, has sinned throughout his days (continued to so those things that harm himself and/or others), there is no reason to think that he will be magically changed into a righteous person in the after-life just because he has died. God will do whatever it takes to correct him.

Jesus death is to deliver us from sin IN THIS LIFE. If we repent (have a change of heart and mind) about our sin and submit to the authority of Christ in our lives, we are in the process of salvation—and we have the promise that that salvation will some day be completed:

Philippians 1:6 And I am sure of this, that He who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ.

However, only a minority of humanity is undergoing the process of salvation from sin. The vast multitude of humanity die in their sin, without having even begun the process. Death will not transform them. The Lord must correct them. He will do whatever it takes, even if that means discomfort—slight or great as required. This is not “punishment” but remediation. In my opinion, this remediation may also include ministry to them by the sons of God being sent to them. God will not give them anymore pain or discomfort than is absolutely necessary.

It seems to me that even those who are now Christ’s disciples may need a degree of post-mortem correction. For surely they also will not be perfect at the time of their death. Their remediation may be effected in that “He who began a good work in us will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ.” Thus “Everyone will be salted with fire.”

I found this worth a read:
yankeegospelgirl.com/2013/04/18 … n-manning/

Whoever this girls is… And I assume it’s a girl, Said:

Says Her. :angry:

What I’ve read about the books and the man, he was a broken individual. And he wrote about it.

I know that 'The Ragamuffin Gospel is another view of God and Christ. Many don’t like that. Any view that differs from theirs is usually wrong and many times heretical.

Read the book. Make your own decision. :smiley:

(thnx eagle.)

Hmm, I could be mistaken, but you’ve definitely “stated or implied” as much elsewhere on the forum, the likes of for example HERE…

Or even HERE…

:sunglasses:

I think repentance is clearly taught by Jesus and the apostles as the way of life, defined as entering a humble state, a broken and a contrite heart. Repentance is the gateway of love . It is also all through the scriptures. Psalm 51 Follows the whole process from recognition to remorse and confession through reconciliation and restoration.

It is departing from the way of life, or refusing it in the first place that leads to correction, in life or post-mortem, and the fire is the light that penetrates and “brings every hidden thing to light”, separates the wheat from the chaff, purges the wood, hay and stubble. Light is fire to darkness. Love is fire to hate. repentance is fire to arrogance and rebellion.

Gehenna, the lake of fire, aionian pyr, these are metaphors for being brought before the light of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

"I kept looking Until thrones were set up, And the Ancient of Days took His seat; His vesture was like white snow And the hair of His head like pure wool. His throne was ablaze with flames, Its wheels were a burning fire. 10"A river of fire was flowing And coming out from before Him; Thousands upon thousands were attending Him, And myriads upon myriads were standing before Him; The court sat, And the books were opened. Dan 7

their conscience bearing witness and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them, 16** on the day when, according to my gospel, God will judge the secrets of men through Christ Jesus. Ro 2
**
“They will be tormented by fire and brimstone before the face of(in the presence of) the Lamb and his holy messengers” Rev 14:10

All of that has to do with repentance, which a word for yielding to God, giving Him glory, acknowledging His righteousness. Entering or renewing a proper attitude towards God and man(love and humility)

“The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise.” Ps 51

Phil 2:11 and 1 Cor 15:25-28 talk about the bowing of the knees of the adversaries. It is His glory that will disarm them and they will repent before Him and bow their knees and confess His Lordship to the glory of God the Father. Maybe it will be short, maybe instant, maybe for some a few stripes maybe some more stripes, the lashes upon the conscience that bring remorse and repentance because of the light of His love breaking through. But i agree with Paidon, Jesus says it will be difficult and is to be avoided.

In my experience it is very difficult, as I believe I know that fire more and more closely as I grow older and the light is breaking through the thinning veil of my carnality.

Behold, thou dost desire truth in the inward parts, and in the secret things thou hast made me to know wisdom.

Remove the sin in me with hyssop(bitterness, remorse, repentance), and I shall be clean; wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow.

Make me to hear joy and gladness that the bones which thou hast broken may rejoice.

Hide thy face from my sins and eradicate all my iniquities.

Create in me a clean heart, O God, and renew a right spirit within me.

Cast me not away from thy presence and take not thy Holy Spirit from me.

Restore unto me the joy of thy saving health, and thy spirit of liberty shall uphold me. Ps 51

Well, I do think repentance is a prerequisite to escaping the severity of the postmortem fire to which the unrepentant will be subject (if that’s what you mean). However, since I do not believe in that fire as penalty, I do not believe repentance to be any means of escape in that sense. Nor do I believe that even the repentant will entirely escape the corrective proclivities of postmortem fire.

Again I quote, “Everyone will be salted (or seasoned) with fire.” (Mark 9:49)

By the way, the words “and every sacrifice will be seasoned with salt” may have been an addition to the original text. The following translations do not contain it: ASV, ESV, HCSB, NASB, RSV, Philips, and Rotherham. The following Greek editions do not contain it: Nestle, Westcott-Hort, Tischendorf, and the Greek edition of Kurt Aland, Matthew Black, Carlo Martini, Bruce Metzger, and Allen Wikgren. Unfortunately, none of the extant manuscripts prior to 300 A.D. contain Mark 9:49. If even one of them did, I would be inclined to accept its wording as the correct one.

Don said,:

To be honest, I had to churn this in my mind for a moment.

It seems that your take from scripture (and your obvious leaning to the early church writers)…

Is that,

1)Post mortem fire is an absolute given
2)So, Repentance is mandatory for escaping how severe the postmortem fire is going to be…
3)But, this postmortem fire is definitely not a penalty, (or I assume you mean punishment of some sort)
4)And you say that repentance ( no matter how sincere) will not keep you from the correction of post mortem fire.

And so,

  1. What is the fire?

And I know we’ve danced around aunt Sally’s house about these things, and you and others have been at it for a while,
I was wondering (though I know it might seem redundant) if you would give some bible references for the above five points?

Finally, for my own interest, you have stated that you believe that repentance* is necessary *for forgiveness, though you do seem to allude to the fact that repentance will not keep you from the fire… That forgiveness does not mean that one will not pass through the fire. Of maybe you are saying that all will pass through the fire before forgiveness. :question:

Forgive (no pun)me if I worded that wrong.

Can you give a few details on these things?
Thanks Paidion.
We may not get much more of a chance to elaborate on this forum. :smiley:

P.S. I have not read your paper that you posted in another topic thread, and I know that there are others that have questioned you about this. Would dearly and sincerely, love an answer.

FWIW, The view you seem to hold, I also held briefly at one point and is in my theological graveyard, though I have moved from it, it was and is a valid stepping stone for understanding.

Though I am not saying you are wrong and I am right… Just being honest.

Chad

**Whether punitive penalty OR propitiating penance your prerequisite is still a price paid… there’s NO difference!
**

That you KEEP applying this to postmortem (WITHOUT scriptural warrant) does not arbitrarily make it so, as in, simply according to your say so. As I’ve pointed out before, you read into the text AND ignore the context… and in consequence, your pretext. But we’ve been here before…

Mk 9:49 needs to be read within the context of the biblical story and not projected beyond it in term of theological interpretation — which is what you are doing. In Jewish practice, all sacrifices were to be salted and no sacrifice was acceptable without it…

Jesus’ being salted had nothing to do with postmortem “correction” but was very much indicative of the antemortem (this life) nature of the preparatory effect persecution was about to bring. According to the context of the passage such salting would indeed be limited and yet fully inclusive of all in that grouping, i.e., the disciples — all disciples in faithful service were a “living sacrifice” (Rom 12:1) and would be tried by the fires of persecution.

Again… as salt accompanied OT sacrifices so would the soon coming fire of trial and tribulation accompany and try (refine) NT believers…

This then as I understand it is what Jesus meant when he said…

I don’t think Jesus made it clear that being salted was exclusive of either case. To limit His words to either position is an assumption not born out by the words He spoke. The whole context of His teaching makes it clear to me that is pertains to both, and this follows in the teaching of the apostles and reflects also the words of the prophets. Peter and Paul both speak of fire in the context of mortal life and the world to come. Daniel speak words that can me interpreted either way. Personally I think it is both, and the fire is the presence of God.

Look at the context and show me how it was not pertinent solely to those of the context i.e., the disciples… vs. 31, 33-34, 38, 50. The whole passage, Eagle, is focused and relative to the disciple, period. You have to stick with context! HOW & WHERE do you find ANY postmortem talk or reference here? << Please answer this. It is a wholly and solely INTRODUCED theological presupposition, i.e., there is NO suggestion of postmortem realities in the text AT ALL.

Such as?? Now before you start proof-texting… ask yourself IF what YOU think is being said is actually being said, or, are you introducing an assumption. Pardon the pun, but fire away…

Davo,

Your assumption that when the Gospel writers’ select Jesus’ words to his disciples, that the church’s readers were to see it as inapplicable to them is different from my perception that they constructed a narrative that could function as a handbook for their generations’ disciples.

As one who sees the need for repentance at the core of the Biblical story, I’m wondering where you see Paidion defining this as a “propitiating” penance, and what you mean by that characterization.

Hi Maintenance Man. Thank you for your respectful inquiry. I’ll do my best. However, I will deal with just 1) and 4) in this post:

I think 1) and 4) can be answered with the statement, “For everyone will be salted (or “seasoned”) with fire” (Mark 9:49). Although Davo thinks that my understanding that this is post-mortem correction, is hogwash, let’s examine it in context:

That little word “for” (γαρ in Greek, or “gar” in transliteration) indicates a connection to the preceding words. And what are the preceding words?

And if your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life crippled than with two hands to go to hell, to the unquenchable fire. And if your foot causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life lame than with two feet to be thrown into hell. And if your eye causes you to sin, tear it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into hell,‘where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched.’

The Greek word translated as “hell” is “γεενvα” usually transliterated as “gehenna” in English characters. The Online Bible Lexicon defines the word as follows:

Now I realize that many want to LIMIT the meaning to the valley of Hinnon. But I doubt that Jesus was referring to that valley in the above quote. For Jesus whole teaching in the quote seems to be symbolic. He doesn’t expect people to cut of their hands and tear out their eyes, if they are the causes of sin, but rather to cast out of their lives whatever induces them to do wrong. And why would “their worm not die” in the valley of Hinnom?
Also, if Jesus is talking about one’s body being cast into Hinnom after death, who cares? Is it of any personal importance what happens to your body after death.

As I see it, Jesus is warning his listeners about the severe correction they will need to undergo post-mortem unless they avoid wrongdoing in this life, eliminating those things from their lives that induce them to sin. Then, although they will still require correction (Everyone will be salted with fire), it will not be the severe correction that will be undergone in Hell (or “Gehenna” if you prefer) by those that continue in wrongdoing without repentance.

You cant take one text and separate it from all the other texts about fire. All the texts about fire must be read to establish context.
Many of them have potential post mortem, or better, time transcendant interpretations, such as Dan 7, Rev 14, Mat 25.

If you cut one verse out of the topical whole cloth it is easy to make a certain assertion- such as you are, but viewed against the larger context of all the scriptures, it is not so easy to limit it, either way.

That fire is God Himself!

Therefore let us be grateful for receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken, and thus let us offer to God acceptable worship, with reverence and awe,for our God is a consuming fire. (Hebrews 12:28,29)

Fire symbolizes God because God “consumes” all sin. That which is not eliminated in this life, must be eliminated in the next. Those who are grateful for receiving the unshakeable Kingdom, and who offer acceptable worship with reverence and awe, will enter life with far less tendency for wrongdoing, and thus there will be less to consume. The fire is God Himself, whose essence is LOVE (1 John 4:8,16). Generally His people will experience LOVE as joy. Even though they may need some correction from it, they will welcome that correction. Whereas those who have rejected God and hate Him will experience LOVE as pain. But sooner or later, they too, will be corrected.

“I kept looking
Until thrones were set up,
And the Ancient of Days took His seat;
His vesture was like white snow
And the hair of His head like pure wool.
His throne was ablaze with flames,
Its wheels were a burning fire.
10
“A river of fire was flowing
And coming out from before Him;
Thousands upon thousands were attending Him,
And myriads upon myriads were standing before Him;
The court sat,
And the books were opened. Dan 7

This is a picture of Jesus Christ in the heavenly realm(time transcendent, beyond the veil, eternal view) much like Ezekiel’s and Isaiah’s and John’s and Stephen’s. It correlates with Romans 2, for me anyway, “On the Day God judges the secrets of men’s hearts by Jesus Christ”

I see a correlation with Isaiah 9

Surely wickedness burns like a fire;
it consumes briers and thorns,
it sets the forest thickets ablaze,
so that it rolls upward in a column of smoke.
19 By the wrath of the Lord Almighty
the land will be scorched
and the people will be fuel for the fire;
they will not spare one another.
20 On the right they will devour,
but still be hungry;
on the left they will eat,
but not be satisfied.

This is more of a picture of the fire as it burns in the world/lifetime of men, as accountability and reaping as they sow, but this comes from the Lord. It is flowing out from Him into the time realm, the threshing floor…

“Everyman will be salted with fire”

Life is the threshing floor upon which God separates the wheat from the chaff, but the tares are gathered to be burned at the end of the age. Since we know that it is “Each in his own order” and that not all are “gathered into one in Christ”(Eph 1) in this age it is not unlikely that some will be gathered in “the ages to come”(Eph 2)

But not to debate the whole preterist historicist thing, because I believe the two are interwoven- and that is my point.

What is happening in the visible world is subject to and flowing out of the invisible world. Jesus is high and lifted up and His train fills the temple(Isaiah 6 and Eph 4), “He who descended is also He who ascended so that He might fill all things” The view from Isaiah 6 is the same as the view from Eph 4:11 and Dan 7:10 and it is not about time, so much as it is about being at various points around the bubble(time) looking into the center(olam) which transcends time, "WHo was foreknown from the foundation of the world(Alpha) and is manifest in these last(completing, finishing) days(Omega)… last days not being only about sequence but also about purpose- the manifestation of heavenly realities into the time realm, the threshing floor… light into chaos bringing the form of a new creation.(2 Peter chapter 3)

“A river of fire was flowing
And coming out from before Him;
Thousands upon thousands were attending Him,
And myriads upon myriads were standing before Him; Dan 7:10

Daniel 7:10 is the same as, or parallel to, Hebrews 12

But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to myriads of angels, 23 to the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and to God, the Judge of all, and to the spirits of the righteous made perfect, 24 and to Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood, which speaks better than the blood of Abel.

and Rev 14

“If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand, 10 he also will drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is mixed [f]in full strength in the cup of His anger; and he will be tormented with fire and [g]brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb.

And it requires the full context of all these verses and many more to even begin to understand what the fire is, where it is, and when it is- His presence, everywhere, always…

Standing in it, for the wicked, post-mortem, will be the revelation that pierces the heart, brings to light every hidden thing, and slays Leviathan the twisting serpent, the worm, Adam. There will be weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth, followed by remorse, reconciliation, rejoicing and restoration.

12 For the word of God is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart. 13 And there is no creature hidden from His sight, but all things are open and laid bare to the eyes of Him with whom we have to do. Heb 4:12,13

His eyes were like a flame of fire. 15 His feet were like burnished bronze, when it has been made to glow in a furnace, and His voice was like the sound of many waters. 16 In His right hand He held seven stars, and out of His mouth came a sharp two-edged sword; and His face was like the sun shining in its strength. Rev 1

In that day the Lord will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent,
With His fierce and great and mighty sword,
Even Leviathan the twisted serpent;
And He will kill the dragon who lives in the sea.

In that day,
“A vineyard of wine, sing of it!
“I, the Lord, am its keeper;
I water it every moment. Isaiah 27:1-3

All of these verses and many more are the context for Mark 9:49, so not to say anyone here is “right” or “wrong”- I just think the polarizing elements may be narrow views of a much wider picture, cut out of whole cloth.

I’d like to see the answer to that as well. :smiley:

The verses I referenced from the passage, if you read them, show this to be NO assumption, i.e., it’s right there in the text.

I don’t assume… “that the church’s readers were to see it as inapplicable to them” — clearly Christendom didn’t see it as inapplicable to them; and… “that they constructed a narrative that could function as a handbook for their generations’ disciples” is IMO fine. But HOW those things were/are made to be applicable CAN be made to say anything WHEN said words are lifted out of their eschatological context; and therefore HOW such things were understood. Jesus wasn’t speaking in some ‘all things to all men’ nebulous vacuum, nor was he speaking over his audiences’ heads… he often spoke to their immediate future.

To appease an offended person (propitiate), in this case God, by the confession of and consequent abolition of sin (penance)… this is Don’s post-mortem repentance via the cleansing fires of ‘the lake of fire’ in order that said candidate (inclusive of all non-believers AND believers) might finally exit said burnings into the relief of Heaven. Until one grasps the fire insurer on a burning one shall go… IMO a load of religious BS. You’ll have to forgive my bluntness.

Neither Jesus nor any of the New Testament writers said nor wrote anything remotely in that direction. IF such had been the case Don would have slam-dunked this issue months ago with said Scriptures… he has not BECAUSE they are not! It is poor practice to bring a notion TOO a text and then summarily squeeze that notion into it.

It should also be noted that Don gives little to no credence to the OT and considers the end of the NT inappropriate and not relevant for issues around “doctrine” (even though he is quite happy to tag in the like of “the lake of fire” where convenient). So, that Don attaches his theological interpretation to Jesus’ “salted with fire” comment is to be taken as a given, and that’s fine, but some textual evidence would be more convincing.

It is interesting to note however that extra-biblical literature, something Don has indicated he does hold with some degree of credence, seems on the surface at least cut right across any notion of his post-mortem repentance

If I have come across as overly critical of Don’s position and expressed such too harshly, then my apologies to you Don… we are after all brothers.

Bluntness? It’s baloney! I do not believe in Christ’s sacrifice as a means of propitiating God in order to escape the lake of fire (if that’s the doctrine you’re attributing to me). I have no idea how you could arrive at such a notion from that which I wrote. What I have said all along is that Christ’s sacrifice is God’s means of delivering us from sin or wrongdoing, and that our repentance is necessary in synergy with Christ’s deliverance through His sacrificial death to bring this about. There is no “fire insurer” in what I have expressed. It is loving correction by the One whose essence is LOVE.

If a human father lovingly corrects his son by withholding privileges, what demeaning name do you have for the father, if he continues to withhold those privileges until the son changes his ways?

By the way, 2 Clement wasn’t written by Clement. I don’t use it in support of any doctrine.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Epistle_of_Clement
I see no reason why the fact of death would prevent us from repenting thereafter.