Hi Cole
Thanks for posting these -there are some lovely quotations from C.S. Lewis here.
I’m glad that John Piper is open to Lewis and his theology of imagination and enjoyment - and that he has been generous to George MacDonald. I know from you that he has compassionate views on the fate of those who die in infancy - even if they are not children of the elect, and from others that he has compassionate views about race and about prosperity gospel teachings. However , George MacDonald is dead and Pastor John was not nearly as generous about or own and dear Tom Talbott.
These ideas don’t originate with Lewis – they come from the ‘thought world’ in which he moved. Especially his idea of enjoying the world aright and in gratitude were inspired by the Cambridge Platonists and Anglican poet Priests in this tradition like Thomas Traherene
You never enjoy the world aright
til you see how sand
exhibiteth the wisdom and the power of God,
and prize in everything the service which they do you
by manifesting in glory and goodness to your soul.
Your enjoyment of the world is never right,
til every morning you awake in heaven:
see yourself in your father’s palace;
and look upon the skies and the earth and the air
as celestial joys
having such a reverned esteem of all,
as if you were among the angels.
You never enjoy the world aright,
til the sea itself floweth in your veins;
til you are clothed with the heavens
and crowned with the stars
and perceive yourself to be the sole heir
of the whole world
Til your spirit filleth the whole world
the stars are your jewels;
Til you are familiar with the ways of God
in all ages as with your walk and table;
Til you are intimately acquainted with that shady nothing
out of which the world was made;
Til you love men so as to desire their happiness,
with an equal thirst to the zeal of your own;
Til you delight in God for being good to all;
You never enjoy the world.
Yet further, you never enjoy the world aright,
til you so love the beauty of enjoying
that you are covetous and earnest
to persuade others to enjoy it.
Likewise Lewis ideas of Romantic theology were deeply inspired by the English Romantic poets with their views on imagination which George MacDonald also shared and, regarding his deep thoughts on love, these were inspired by Christian Platonism and the Romantic theology of Charles William via Dante’s figure of Beatrice. That Pastor John can be inspired by these things is good – they are accents that are largely absent from the American Calvinist Puritan tradition and they are good things that he has perceived as an absence and felt deeply attracted to. They are part of a tradition that is less distrustful of the body and of creation and has been nourished by liturgy and sacrament. The same tradition yielded a more poetic image based understanding of the Bible which is miles away from the inerrancy propositionalism of Reformed orthodoxy that Pastor John belongs to.
Again I am glad Pastor John feels nourished by George Herbert. The context of his poems – that he asked on his death bed to be published to comfort despairing souls– was an Anglican emphasis of encouraging people not to feel bereft of God and reprobate just because of melancholy and a lack of feeling of God’s assurance. It was a pastoral reaction against the Calvinism of his day that drove so many to despair. Here’s a lovely on by Herbert –
Come, my way, my truth, my life:
Such a way as gives us breath;
Such a truth as ends all strife,
Such a life as killeth death.
Come, my light, my feast, my strength:
Such a light as shows a feast,
Such a feast as mends in length,
Such a strength as makes his guest.
Come, my joy, my love, my heart:
Such a joy as none can move,
Such a love as none can part,
Such a heart as joys in love.
So I am grateful and in good hope that Pastor John is promoting writings that give Neo Calvinists access to a completely different Christian worldview of thought and feeling and imagination. It doesn’t change my mind about his teachings on double predestination, male authority over women, God having created most human beings for damnation etc - these are emotive things for a non TULIP Calvinist to take on board and he promotes the idea in ways that are very provocative to the thoughts, feelings and imagination of non Calvinists. But putting these issues aside he is in some ways a complex man.
Good courage to you friend -
Dick