Hi Everybody,
I’m sure most of you are familiar with Luther’s statement re “sinning boldly”. Surely, it has been misappropriated as cheap grace, but on the other hand, it has been a real consolation to me on some dark nights of soul.
Anyway, I am curious as to some of your experiences with sanctification since becoming universalists, especially if you had a long period as a Cal or Arm before coming to universalism. That is, have you found it easier to be holy since realizing the truth of UR - or - do you find yourself “sinning boldly” (and perhaps that is holier than external holiness if you get my drift)?
I ask because I am struggling with some nagging sin that is very tempting and it is SOOOOO easy for me to write off in the face of universalism. Hehe, i have daydreams of Luther drinking from steins and saying goodbye to emaciation (though my particular nagging sin isn’t gluttony or drunkenness, i like his relative peace of mind). Mind you, as a universalist I still believe that God has wrath for sin and you reap what you sow to a large extent. Yet, it takes the edge off. Not that there is any necessary connection between Luther and universalism (though I think they are connected and I would even argue that Luther was a proto-universalist of a sort); when i believe that i am saved no what and God loves me no matter what, it is much easier for me to justify sin. Now, if i wasn’t shallow, i should be more of the mentality - Jesus has paid such a high price for my redemption - why wallow in the muck? Of course, to me the beauty of Luther’s theology is that he stressed the state of sin, more more than sins, and that perhaps thumbing your nose to grace is far, far, far worse than worrying about a nagging sin…
Ach, it is becoming a ramble but I’m sure you all know where I’m coming from and I’d appreciate your feedback.